Which Os Is Best For Mac Pro (Late 2013)10/20/2021
Using the Mac Aluminium keyboard may cause troubles. Beware to specify the Macintosh keyboard layout during installation. From here on the Mac Pro will run like any other Ubuntu install. - iMac (27-inch, Late 2013) - iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2013) - iMac (27-inch, Late 2012) - iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2012) - Mac mini - Mac mini (Late 2014) - Mac mini Server (Late 2012) - Mac mini (Late 2012) - Mac Pro - Mac Pro (Late 2013) iMac - MacBook - MacBook (Retina, 12-inch, Early 2016) - MacBook (Retina, 12-inch, Early 2015) - iMacThe mid-level 13-inch Apple MacBook Pro (1,799) gives you better connectivity and a faster 2.9GHz Core i5 processor than you get from the 1,499 base model.For the original German review, see here.Save and reboot.
![]() ![]() Which Os Is Best Pro (Late 2013) Mac Aluminium KeyboardThe only drawback is the sharp edge at the front of the touchpad.After one week, we also encountered keyboard and trackpad issues. Scrolling, zooming and swiping work flawlessly and without any apparent problems. Here we can see the result of the close relationship between software and hardware. The combination of a smooth glass surface, convenient pressure point, precise execution and smart drivers under OS X is more or less unrivaled in the Windows world. » 54 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. ↔ Response Time Black to WhiteThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). The RAID configuration only managed a 16% higher score and only reached between 58% and 94% of the performance in the copy benchmark. The Apple SSD with the designation SM0256F uses a controller (S4LNO53X01-8030) and memory chips (K9HFGY8S5C-XCK0) from Samsung.The AS SSD overall score shows that the Samsung SSD does not have to hide behind two SanDisk X110s (RAID 0) in the Zenbook UX301. This solution can even compete with larger and vulnerable RAID 0 configurations that can be found in the Asus Zenbook Infinity UX301LA, for example. It provides significantly higher sequential transfer rates than single SSDs via SATA. The 2012 Retina only managed 47% of the HD 5100's performance in the 3DMark 11 GPU Test for instance, however, 3DMark 11 is not really affected by memory bandwidth. Most review units only manage 70% of the performance and the difference to the old MBP Retina with Intel HD Graphics 4000 is huge. The advantage over the HD 4400 (GT2), which is used in many ultrabooks, is impressive. By the way, the Core i7 can use another 100 MHz with a maximum clock of 1200 MHz, which should result in a theoretical performance advantage with sufficient cooling.Synthetic benchmarks under Windows 8.1 show the performance of the new GPU. The clock is dynamically adjusted between 2 MHz via Turbo Boost. Single 4K operations are however not the strong suit of the drive.Despite this 4K problem, the Samsung SSD shows very good results in the Tracing benchmarks of PCMark 7 and 8 and can take a top spot in our charts.The integrated Intel Iris Graphics 5100 is the GT3 version of the Haswell GPU with all shaders, but without the dedicated memory from the Iris Pro 5200. Generally speaking, the gaming performance in Windows is comparable.Our benchmark site of the Iris Graphics 5100 shows that current games are usually only playable with lowest details.We also tested two games in OS X Mavericks (via Steam). These results can be affected by cooling, drivers, game patches since our review of the Asus or measuring tolerances. The gaming benchmarks show mixed results the Asus was around 5-10% faster in FIFA and Company of Heroes 2, but also 5% slower in Tomb Raider and Total War: Rome II. However, the i7 has a 100 MHz higher GPU clock with Turbo Boost. Best project management program for macHowever, it worked flawlessly in our test. Apple has unfortunately only used the decoder for H.264 in OS X. Even Civilization V was playable and looked quite nice at 1280x800 with default settings (Medium / Low).The Core i5-4258U has an integrated hardware decoder for H.264, WMV and VC-1 for videos with a resolution of up to 4K. Playback of 1080p videos in WEBM, WMV and VC-1 produced more CPU load but the playback was smooth. Even a 4K video did not show any dropped frames and CPU load was quite low.VC-1 and WMV are not supported by the standard video player, so we installed the free VLC Player. A 1080p H.264 video showed a similar CPU load, which confirms the use of the hardware decoder.YouTube Flash videos were no problem for the MacBook Pro Retina, either.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorChris ArchivesCategories |